Monday, October 18th 2010

Two DonorsChoose projects you must support: Girls are good at math, and Technology tools while pregnant

ResearchBlogging.orgThere are two projects on my DonorsChoose Giving Page that I want to draw special attention to today. If my statcounter is correct, if all my readers gave just five dollars each to these two projects, they would meet their goals.

Girls are good at math

The first is Girls are good at math! We will PROVE it! This project, which only needs $190 more dollars, is to buy math manipulatives for students at a new girls’ academy in Houston, Texas. Access to these resources will give these young girls the kind of material they need to learn math in hands-on ways, from a probability spinner to ‘Smath. Encouraging girls to succeed in science and math has serious repercussions for them all the way through secondary school. I won’t cite too extensively, but there have been studies of how students’ effort versus ability are rewarded, and the implicit biases teachers often hold about male and female student abilities in math — even in six year olds in the first grade, and even when they directly contradict evidence about which students are actually the best at math (Alessandri and Lewis 1993, Fennema et al 1990).

Please give to this project to continue to give girls the tools they need to succeed in math, and thus to give them the confidence to consider math and science specialties as they get older.

Finishing school, supporting your family

The second project I want to highlight today is Technology tools while pregnant. I have friends who had trouble finishing degrees because of their pregnancies and caring for their babies. And I know two people who have served this population in the past as teachers. I know how hard the job is, how isolating it is for the instructor and the students, and how few resources are usually allocated to these programs. These students will be on the right track to being able to financially support their children if they are given the resources to finish their high school degrees.

The teacher for this project is asking for a few netbooks and graphing calculators for her students, because many of them live in high poverty areas and do not have access to these products. This project will help these students do their homework, and will provide an interesting medium on which to do it, which should help with retention.

Please give to this project to help young women who are pregnant or recently given birth, so that they can finish high school and go on to college or secure better jobs than they could without this degree.

It only takes five dollars from each of you!

References

Alessandri SM, & Lewis M (1993). Parental evaluation and its relation to shame and pride in young children Sex Roles, 29, 335-343

Fennema, E., Peterson, P., Carpenter, T., & Lubinski, C. (1990). Teachers attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21 (1), 55-69 DOI: 10.1007/BF00311015

Comments Off on Two DonorsChoose projects you must support: Girls are good at math, and Technology tools while pregnant

Friday, October 15th 2010

Around the web: levels of analysis

The “Around the Web” series highlights informative websites, and also targeted blog posts and news articles, relevant to the courses I teach. This semester I teach Anth 143: Biology of Human Behavior, an introductory-level course that covers the basics of evolution, behavioral biology, and the interaction of biology and culture. My hope is that these posts are useful not only for my current students, but other people hoping to gain background or insight into these topics.

This week students learned about proximate and ultimate causation — the two overarching ethological levels of analysis (within which we also have developmental and mechanistic levels within proximate, and phylogenetic and evolutionary levels within ultimate causation). In addition to a lesson and reading on this topic (including this post by David Sloan Wilson), we applied our thinking by watching the PBS Special Ape Genius, which focuses on a comparative primatological approach to understanding human cognitive ability. If you haven’t seen the film, you really must! It is available for free, albeit in chunks, at the link above.

Today I’d like to share a few blog post links on proximate and ultimate causation, and a few on primate cognition just because they’re fun and relevant to the film. Then of course, I’ll throw in a few other random links that I think you’ll like.

Proximate and ultimate causation

Greg Laden offers a great perspective on proximate and ultimate causation as it relates to same-sex couples in the animal kingdom. It’s a nice link to our earlier work on sexuality.

Patrick Clarkin, a professor at UMass Boston, provides a nice analysis of the proximate/ultimate distinction as it applies to war.

An article in Psychology Today from this summer connects the proximate/ultimate distinction to a reconception of Maslow’s hierarchy. Should be useful for all the psych majors in the class!

Finally, an article you may not first recognize as being about the levels of analysis, but I think nicely demonstrates our need to understand proximate (mechanism) and ultimate (anticipating adaptation when thinking about the future) levels. It is also a nice demonstration of how our understanding of evolutionary theory — particularly regarding ancestry and our ability to build only on whatever raw material our ancestors give us — is important. And then of course it also discusses ape laughter. Fun! (10/18/10 ETA added forgotten link to this paragraph)

Primate cognition and behavior

You may find a few other related posts and articles on primate behavior stimulating. First, not totally related but certainly fun, Ed Yong’s post Bonobo males get sex with help from their mums documents how mothers help make introductions and even fight off competing males to help their sons maximize mating opportunities. Incidentally, Ed also just won one of the 2010 National Academies Communication Awards. This is a big deal not just for Ed, who is an exceptional writer and probably deserves one of every award we can possibly give him, but to the science blogosphere, whose legitimacy is swiftly increasing (despite the occasional curmudgeon — and besides, see a great response and a round-up of other responses here). This is a great thing for science communication and literacy.

Onward. Here is an interesting PLoS ONE article on cognitive differences in chimps and bonobos. You may recognize two author names — Brian Hare and Michael Tomasello — because they were both featured extensively in Ape Genius. Cool stuff!

Random, but really kinda related, links

First, those of you in the Chambana area — Jorge Cham of PhD Comics fame is here! Go see him speak tonight. I feel like such a fangirl.

The two other links I want to share are a bit more directly related to the course. First, Scientific American has an interesting story chronicling our lives “from womb to tomb” — it covers the field of fetal and developmental origins. As we get more into behavioral endocrinology this will come up more, but this kind of research has implications not only for behavior but for health. It’s a pretty new field and we need to tread carefully, but understanding prenatal origins of variation is a very worthy goal.

Second, I thought this post over at Gene Expression on the Human Nature Top 10 was an interesting take on “humaniqueness.” Check out both the post and the comment thread for some interesting thoughts on what constitutes both widely accepted and undervalued aspects of human nature.

That’s it for this week. Have a great weekend!

Comments Off on Around the web: levels of analysis

Wednesday, October 13th 2010

Women scienceblogger DonorsChoose roundup

As many of you know by now, there is a Science Blogger DonorsChoose Challenge happening now through November 10th. I wanted to give some special attention to the Women Science Bloggers who have set up giving pages. Check these out, and please contribute what you can!

Anne Jefferson: DonorsChoose page and blog

biochem belle: DonorsChoose page and blog

Candid Engineer: DonorsChoose page and blog

Dr. Becca, PhD: DonorsChoose Page and blog

Dr. Free-Ride: DonorsChoose page and blog

Geeka: DonorsChoose page and blog

Gene Geek: DonorsChoose page and blog

Gerty-Z: DonorsChoose page and blog

Kate Clancy: DonorsChoose page and blog

Krystal D’Costa: DonorsChoose page and blog

Professor In Training: DonorsChoose page and blog

Scicurious: DonorsChoose page and blog

Did I miss anyone? I’m sure I have. Tell me in the comments and I’ll add them.